I could whip Quentin Tarrantino’s %#! up and down Main Street for making a multi-faceted piece of work that a 700-800 word review cannot contain. Readers, this film review is long … well … so is the film for that matter. To accommodate the cornucopia of ‘stuff and things’ this eclectic director packs into all 165 minutes on celluloid, ‘Django Unchained’ has to be written in parts. Here is Part One. Be forewarned: you will need some tea and an afternoon to read through it. Bear with me.
‘Django Unchained’ is a rich filmic kaleidoscope paying homage to film and literary genres, art forms, political currents, and moments in the history of the United States. To begin, the director reflects on the Spaghetti Western of the 1960s (The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly, and Django, 1966; Find a Place to Die, 1968); and the Blaxploitation western (Buck and the Preacher, 1972 and Take a Hard Ride, 1976) and plantation drama of the 1970s (The Legend of Nigger Charley, 1972 and Drum, 1976). Second, Django’s blue velvet suit (with knee pants), and fancy buckled shoes, imagined by costume designer, Sharon Davis, bring to mind The Blue Boy, painted in 1770 by English portrait and landscape painter Thomas Gainsborough, and Richard Birch’s illustrations of Little Lord Fauntleroy’s costume in the children’s book of the same name (1885-1886). Third, ‘Mandingo Fighting’ decidedly refers to not only the film Mandingo (1975); the brutal sports event is a strong allusion to “Battle Royal”, a chapter in Invisible Man written in 1952 by African American novelist Ralph Ellison. Finally, but not complete, the ex-slave narratives of the 18th and 19th centuries; the abolitionist movement; the North Star (Frederick Douglass’s newspaper of the same name and the icon of the Underground Railroad); even Opera (Richard Wagner’s Gotterdamerung of 1876) cohere to build a charming love story infused with German folklore (Siegfried and Brunhilde) within the framework of slavery in the United States.
‘Django Unchained’ nestles easily within the genre of romance, and this element forms the rare pearl within the film. The context that frames the love story warrants a brief commentary before I continue. As Nathanial Hawthorne examines Puritan culture in The Scarlet Letter (1850), and Arna Bontemps assesses the slave revolt in Black Thunder (1936), Tarantino reaches into the past to consider present-day socio-cultural moeurs.
Despite the nimiety of posts and articles swirling about Tarantino; Spike Lee’s rant; and questions over whether or not white people can tell our stories; when all is said, read, and done … slavery happened. Period. Yet, the historical distance compromises our national memory as attempts are made to chain this ragged but alert specter to the past. We have heard, if not entertained, every excuse and plea to disremember its legacy: I didn’t do it; I was not there! Why can’t we just forget? What is the big deal? Every so often, however, that specter will agitate for a production of a story to activate yet another discussion in its honor. We can depend on our popular culture to oblige its request. John Korty’s televised production The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman (1974) and Marvin J. Chomsky’s dramatization of Alex Haley’s Roots (1977) compelled my generation to remember as we feasted on the fruits of integration; and for those who were allowed to see them in the movie theater, the plantation dramas of the 1970s as well. As a young woman in search of a purpose in the 1990s, Haile Gerima’s poignant Sankofa (1993) encouraged me to continue learning my own history.
The popularity of ‘Django Unchained’ attended by a whirlpool of discourses, then, not only is important; it is necessary. The election of President Barack Hussein Obama ushered into the White House three generations of African Americans: the First Lady’s mother, Mrs. Marian Lois Shields Robinson; the President and the First Lady; and Natasha “Sasha” and Malia Ann. Some people are tempted to declare that race no longer matters and, now, well we can … exhale. Tarantino’s ‘Django Unchained’ antagonizes this temptation. Thanks to his reputation, the present-day generation has taken notice. ‘Django Unchained’ transports this generation into its own sankofa, Akan meaning “to go back and get it”. They are “to get” that the plantation regime released capillaries infected with a psychology that took a firm hold on the American psyche, culture, and society for some 300 plus years. Kerry Washington even concedes in an interview with The Daily Beast,
It’s so unthinkable that my ancestors endured all the torture and pain. I saw things in the script and thought this never happened. But then I talked to Quentin and he showed us the history books that illustrated the masks and other items used to inflict torture and violence on the slaves. It really blew my mind and made me appreciate even more what my ancestors made it through.
That Tarantino informs Washington of her ancestral history solicits critique, but let us reserve that for another review and move on to the love and the passion.
The consideration of the Django (Jamie Foxx) and Broomhilda (Kerry Washington) love story brings to relief an interview ABC’s Good Morning America host Robin Roberts conducted with the Obamas while on the presidential campaign trail in 2008. In that interview, Roberts turned to the GOP backlash over a remark Mrs. Obama made on being an American. Mrs. Obama leaned in to answer but Mr. Obama interjected on her behalf with the following statement:
If [the GOP] think that they’re going to try to make Michelle an issue in this campaign. […] I find unacceptable, the notion that you start attacking my wife or my family. […] lay off my wife. She loves this country. For them to try to distort or to play snippets of her remarks in ways that are unflattering to her is, I think, just low class. I think that most of the American people would think that as well.
In essence, Mr. Obama drew the proverbial line in the sand and dared anyone to disparage Mrs. Obama in any way, form, or fashion. Any move to the contrary, and he was coming back to collect some dues.
Django (the ‘D’ is silent) is a slave-turned-bounty hunter in desperate search to find his wife, Broomhilda. She was sold down the river to the notorious Calvin Candie (Leonardo DiCaprio), owner of Candieland plantation in Mississippi. He locates Broomhilda with the help of Dr. King Schultz (Christoph Waltz). Django stands ready to defend her at all costs but he has to court discipline before he (re)acts. Django’s poise corresponds not only with Mr. Obama’s warning to the GOP; also, his composure calls up moments in African American history when Black men supported families in an oppressive culture that generally denied the recognition of the institution for the enslaved. The film opens in 1858 somewhere in Texas–eight years after a more restrictive Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 took effect. James Buchanan is president of the United States. The year before, the Supreme Court ruled in Dred Scott v. Sanford that an enslaved Scott could not obtain his freedom because he was not a U. S. citizen. Until that final decision, Scott petitioned not only for his freedom, he sued for the freedom of his wife and children. In another but similar vein, research shows that African Americans searched for family members before and after the Emancipation Proclamation. Help Me Find My People: The African American Search for Family Lost in Slavery (U of North Carolina P, 2012) by Heather Andreas Williams is worth the read. Django’s pursuit of Broomhilda after obtaining freedom undeniably complements these histories and contemporary politics.
In Django’s quest, Tarantino crafts an African American Hero who slays the ‘dragon’, gets the girl, and lives to tell his own story with witnesses to spread his legend. Foxx plays Django with the confidence of a panther stalking its prey. Even though enslaved, he is not a slave in mind. He speaks with a purpose, walks with the familiar cowboy swagger, and commands a horse to ride and to dance. More significant, his unwavering focus on the rescue of Broomhilda dispels several stereotypes and myths. First, he is not the subservient “yes’m massa” enslaved who, if freed, would not know what to do with his freedom. Second, Django overturns the myth of the enslaved and his inability to manage emotions President Thomas Jefferson so brazenly posits in his ‘Notes on Slavery’ written in 1785. Jefferson believes,
[t]hey are at least as brave, and more adventuresome. But this may perhaps proceed from want of forethought, which prevents their seeing a danger till it be present. When present they do not go through it with more coolness or steadiness than the whites. They are more ardent after their female: but love seems with them to be more an eager desire, than a tender delicate mixture of sentiment and sensation.
Eager desire? Want of forethought? Who cannot feel the sheer urgency of Django’s yearning to liberate the black woman from torture and to facilitate the restoration of her honor? Who cannot appreciate Django’s steady nerve in his methodical assessment of every situation? Django not only will die for Broomhilda; also, for his woman, he will live! More significant, who cannot apprehend Broomhilda from Django’s point of view? In his eyes, she is his true love rising up through the mist in the lake. Through the lens of the plantocracy, however, Broomhilda is but property to be raped and branded. Is it not striking to see Django plead to stand in for Broomhilda as the overseer strips her back in preparation for the lash from the whip? That Broomhilda harbors her own belief in Django–not in massa or anyone else—is even more meaningful.
‘Django Unchained’ is a well-made film. We must remember, however, Tarrantino has not done anything new, but viewing ‘Django Unchained’ is crucial for today’s generation. Others came before him and offered up their own powerful stories of captivity and oppression. Let me suggest again Sankofa, a fervid narrative of bondage by Haile Gerima, and add Quilombo (1986) by Carlos Diegues (both on DVD). Each deserves your interest and dollars just as much as Tarrantino. On the whole, these are stories we all have to summon the courage to witness.
(A special ‘Thank You’ to Sandra Denise Clifton and historian Herbert Jefferson for their valuable insights and stimulating discussions on this film; to Dr. Robert Haller for editor’s notes.)
Watch for in-depth Film • Television • & More reviews & commentary.
Next Part Two: ‘Samuel L. Jackson & Stephens’
In the meantime, Catch a film … Share the Popcorn … Feed Your Soul!
Tony Martin
/ January 13, 2013Excellent critique. I am a huge fan of Quinton’s films, because they provoke thought. I will probably see it again, and watch for things not seen the first time.
RA Perry
/ January 13, 2013I thought the film entertaining, and familiar, however, your detailed analysis cleared up the reasons why. Quinton does seem to have borrowed “a little of this and little of that” from past film’s which allowed me to become more comfortable with Django Unchained. I appreciate the story lines, one liner’s and out of step humor of the “Spaghetti Western’s.” As an African American, I certainly admired the twist of this film where African American characters rode off into the sunset to celebrate the success of their challenging story. I look forward to more films were I am able to remember the character names of African American characters, and it is my hope to see more of these type films lining the Silver Screens of America soon. Thank you for this review, I found it both insightful and enlightening because of the conversation surrounding the film.
Kbell
/ January 13, 2013Great review. Your parallels reminded of how powerful and legendary Mandingo will always be. This movie begs a “re-watch”. Not a perfect story but “lest we forget” and this adaptation of history will draw other audiences. I had to chuckle when u mentioned Buck and the Preacher. Thank you for Part I and I’m waiting for Part II.
Raul G. Barcenes
/ January 16, 2013excellent. I will be sure to check it out
Ty
/ January 17, 2013I thought Django was a great movie! It was great to see a man willing to move heaven and earth to get his wife back.
Morgan
/ January 17, 2013I am so thankful for your review. Other discussions I have been having with people who have seen the movie involves Christop Waltz’s character, Dr. Schultz. In many movies that portray Black heroes and sheroes, these individuals can only be seemingly successful if their ventures are supported by a White vigilante. In a way, Dr. Schulz can be seen as that person for D’Jango. I would think that Dr. Schulz also gives people who are uncomfortable with slavery someone to identify with as good and not part of the horrific happenings of the time. Comments?
drdreher01
/ January 18, 2013Yes, Morgan, EXACTLY on the Schultz character. A student of mine made the same observation about that character. As for the “buddy” aspect of the film, Tarrantino does create that relationship; yet in the end he obliterates it reminding the audience that this film is about Django and his heroic deeds and not about the white character saving him. In case audiences still were wondering, he kills him off–he does not wound him–and it is Django and Broomhilda for the rest of the film. Thank you for your comments.
Shannon
/ January 25, 2013Great reference tie-ins from film and literature! When the “Candieland” plantation was first mentioned in the film, I couldn’t help but think of Toni Morrison’s “Sweet Home” plantation in Beloved. It would be interesting to find out how many of these ironically named plantations really existed, and how these names messed with the heads of the slaves (and their owners). Candieland took us out of what viewers expect to occur on a plantation and showed us the hyper-sexualization of black bodies: Calvin Candie’s bar/salon full of sensually dressed black women, the homoerotic spectatorship of black male wrestling (to the death), etc. I’m both surprised and not surprised by Kerry Washington’s comment about not believing how brutally slaves were tortured. Unfortunately, I think our media- and technologically- driven culture turns those opportunities for learning about black history — events like Black History Month — into the same series of sound bites and images to which we’ve grown densensitized. The black church has also greatly reduced its emphasis on black history; with the rise of the mega-church with its mega-TV screens (and the rise of the children’s church as a result), children are no longer required to read and recite the works of famous black writers such as Wheatley, Garvey, DuBois, Johnson, Hughes, Brooks, Angelou, etc. in front of congregations. We all really need to get back to the stacks in the libraries. I applaud Tarantino’s work and hope that those filmmakers, writers, directors, etc. who had issues with it will be creative enough to contribute to what Tarantino offers as the start of a new, or a re-newed, genre(s).
Star
/ March 31, 2013When interviewed, Tarantino said the White man owes African Americans a huge debt and whites cannot just bury their heads in the sand stating “Not me, it was my ancestors who enforced slavery. I am not responsible for my ancestor’s past” and so on and so forth. But whites are responsible as long as they live under “privilege.” As long as they go into the lands of people of color and steal their natural resources with the attitude of entitlement. As long as they enforce poverty in communities of color. As long as they destroy the educational institutes, blaming experienced teachers while bringing in inexperienced teachers to dumb down students. As long as those running the music biz pay black artists 30 pieces of silver to malign, desert and disrespect their women. These Black artists who betray their own could stand to watch Django to get some backbone and stop insulting and hating their women by poisoning the minds of the youth that digest their hateful rap music like candy. Youth who through this programming walk away self-hating.
The fact that a white man had to tell Kerry Washington her own history is pathetic. Didn’t she even prepare for the role by studying her history? In fact, she should have learned her history at her parent’s knee. The fact she wasn’t embarrassed to even utter the words in that interview, shows her gross ignorance.. If you do not know your history, how can you know your future. Sadly I saw her on stage in “Race,” where her performance suggested she was insecure and uncomfortable on stage and maybe even with the subject of race. Some Black people have become so uncomfortable with race they want to fit in to the point of white-washing themselves until they are barely recognizable as black.
Yes, the Black Race is in need of a psychiatrist to deal with the horrors of race issues and evil treatment by whites that has been programmed and instilled in African Americans and others of color, since the White Race enter their lives bringing greed and oppression both in the past and in the present. Blacks must find a way to release from the chains on their minds and the chaos that is leading them down a path of mistrust of their own, self-hatred, destructive behavior and dismissal of the education necessary to lift them out of lust for the material. To become whole African Americans must return to balance, spirituality, race-pride and community. All the things they possessed before slavery.